War On Driving

#1 Activists Convince LAPD Commission and City Council to End Red Light Camera Program

Here it is, your top moment of 2011 in the War On Driving. This takes us back to July 27th, when L.A. City Council voted unanimously to end the city’s red light camera program.

Much credit goes to Jay Beeber and his organization, SaferStreetsLA.org.

After watching this video, you’ll see why the cameras made intersections more dangerous while costing the city and its motorists millions upon millions of dollars.

Thanks for sticking with us through 2011 and we’ll be back with more content and a new site in 2012! 

Happy New Year.

Photo Ticketing Opponents Featured in Long Island Press Article

Courtesy of The Long Island Press 

Seeing Red: Long Island’s Controversial Red Light Cameras

By Shelly Feuer Domash on October 6th, 2011

While making a left turn onto Uniondale Avenue from Jerusalem Avenue, a busy intersection in Uniondale, John Bohannon of Wantagh saw a pedestrian talking on a cell phone.

“[She was] sauntering across in front of me, oblivious to traffic,” he says. “I had to stop even though she was a jaywalker, walking against the ‘Don’t Walk’ sign.”

Bohannon had two choices: “Run her down and go on my merry way or stop and let her cross while the cameras flashed away. The light was red, a very bright sixty-dollar red.”

The inevitable ticket came, with the pedestrian clearly shown on the attached photo, he tells the Press. He chose not to fight it, however. A colleague of his in a similar situation got just $10 off of his fine after launching a lengthy and costly protest.

Charlie Sellitto of Bellmore has another tale.

“I was close enough to an 18-wheeler that the light could not be seen over the truck,” he explains. “I got another one that showed I was entering the turn when the picture was taken.”

Sellitto, too, decided not to fight because it was just easier to pay.

Former Nassau District Judge Samuel Levine did, though. His wife Lee was driving his car. She says the yellow light was too short and did not want to stop for fear of a rear-end collision. Although Levine did not win at his hearing, he still continues to battle what he describes as “serious civil rights, constitutional law and public safety problems” regarding the now 100 locations where 252 red-light cameras watch drivers throughout Nassau and Suffolk counties. And more are on their way.

Almost every Long Islander has, or knows someone who has, their own bitter and frustrating story. Are red light cameras a necessary evil that will reduce the number of accidents? Or are they just a money maker for the municipality and the private companies that install them? Can grassroots groups be successfully heard against the money and power of the large corporations who manufacture them?

One thing’s certain. Though many taxpayers here on Long Island may know little, if anything about the issue (other than seeing more and more bright lights flashing at intersections across the Island), the Press has learned that the two companies hired by Nassau and Suffolk counties to administer the red-light camera program—and rake in millions of dollars—have a sketchy, well-documented history of controversy behind them, spending huge amounts of money to fight local residents who oppose the cameras, millions on hiring lobbyists and contributing to the campaigns of politicians who are in favor of the cameras.

[continue reading (pg. 2)]

Vote on L.A. Red Light Cameras By City Council is “Likely” on Friday

UPDATE: After testimony, mostly by ATS employees, including Charley Territo and CEO James Tuton, LA City Council decided to delay even voting on the “suggestive measure” until Tuesday.

LAist has more details.

…………………………………………………………………………………………

American Traffic Solutions is clinging to life in Los Angeles for another 48 hours, but the likelihood of them surviving the month of June is extremely low.

Two council members have been persuaded by an ATS lobbyist to introduce a motion to continue the red light camera scam on a monthly basis while a “safety analysis” is conducted.

A 2/3 majority is needed to overrule the unanimous decision of the LAPD commission to nix the scamera system and 2 council members is not nearly enough. According to an LA Times piece from Tuesday, there’s a lot of doubt that the motion would carry any water at all even if it was passed.

The bottom line is that Friday is the deadline for the council to take action and the clock is ticking on ATS. One of the council members who now appears to be in the back pocket of ATS is saying that a vote on this measure to save the program is “likely.”

Calls by CameraFRAUD asking for an official statement this week were not returned. The city council seems to be in disarray over the police commission’s recommendation and the most likely scenario is that ATS intersection cams in Los Angeles will be turned off by the end of June.

More debate on this subject courtesy of Pajamas Media (PJTV) from last week:

by CameraFRAUD

Red Light Cameras Voted Out of Los Angeles Intersections by Police Commission

Jay Beeber of Sherman Oaks, CA has been hard at work and it paid off in a big way today when the Los Angeles Police Commission voted to completely dismantle the city’s red light camera program.

Before the vote, Jay and some citizens from various parts of Los Angeles spoke out against the red light scameras:

 

From Patch.com

The Los Angeles Board of Police Commissioners voted Tuesday morning to get rid of the red light cameras at intersections. This is a major victory for Jay Beeber, a member of the Sherman Oaks Neighborhood Council, who has been campaigning  against the use of the cameras.

But the matter issue must still be voted upon by the Los Angeles City Council.

Beeber was clearly pleased with the outcome of today’s vote.

“The commissioners decided that the red light cameras at intersections did not make traffic any safer. They also said the millions of dollars spent on the program was not worth the money,” said Beeber, after coming out of this morning’s hearing.

<continue reading>